• Blog Stats

    • 89,097 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 168 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

  • Advertisements

Resistor polyhedra

Dear Reader,

Those of you who want to work out your brains might be interested in the resistor polyhedra contest article which I wrote for RadCom. This has been designed to be a challenge which will both tax the minds of very bright people with years of experience in physics / electronics and also offer the new commer some easier problems to allow them to get their feet wet.

I have made a lot of funny networks out of 1000 ohm metal film resistors, my trusty 25 W Antex iron has been very handy for this task. I tend to like to use a iron jacketed 25 W Antex iron for most soldering work. I bought the Antex back in 1992 and it is still going strong. I used to use a 25 W Weller (from the late 1980s) with a copper tip but I found that that the tips were dissolving in the solder too much for my liking. I have to confess that I worked a lot with the Weller, the Weller had coated tips but they did slowly age and dissolve. So what I used to do with that iron was to use 1970s solid copper tips from another older iron I used to own as a lad. I used to have to file the copper tips once in a while to get the shape right.

I have found that a 50 W temperture controlled Weller with a modern tip to be a nice iron. I think that it is a better iron for large items than the 25 W Antex. But I think if you want the best value for money the 25 W Antex is hard to beat. I used that in my youth to build quite a few things.

RadCom is the magazine of the RSGB (Radio Society of Great Britain). Sadly due to an error in the production process it did not publish a closing date. The closing date is 08:30 GMT on the 7th of Jan 2019. To have a chance an entry must have reached the RadCom office by that time / date.

The contest is in RadCom in the december issue at around page 40

The rules by which I will be judging the contest are

Rule 1.

If one person has calculated or measured correctly more networks than any other person, then this person shall be the winner. Any person who gets within 2 % of the correct value will be judged to have got it correct. The networks made by Mark Foreman are to be used to referee what the correct values of the networks are. If the RadCom office or other RSGB workers were to create their own versions of the networks then the average of the values measured from the networks will be used.

Rule 2.

If under rule 1 no single winner can be identified, then Mark Foreman will judge the method used to determine the values of the networks. Mark Foreman normally favers methods which use the bare minimum of advanced mathematics. Thus if the solution requires exotic things like Laplace transformations, matrix operations and the like he will disfavour. Mark Foreman reserves the right to consult other people when judging methods which use advanced maths.

Rule 3.

If under rules 1 and 2 no single winner can be identified, then the first most correct and elegant answer to arrive at the radcom office will be the winner.

Rule 4.

If under rules 1, 2 and 3 no single winner can be identified, then the winner will be randomly selected. The possible winners will be assigned numbers such as 1, 2, 3 and 4. Then Mark will use a measurement of the background radiation in his office or lab as a random number generator. The least significant digit in the total count numbers (number of events detected) will be used to decide the winner.

Advertisements

Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: