• Blog Stats

    • 85,382 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 164 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

  • Advertisements

Nuclear panic

Dear Reader,

It has come to my attention that in Austria a series of schools were evacuated following the discovery of a “hot rock”, a person named Thomas Neff found a rock with a GM (geiger) counter which was emitting what he regarded as a lot of radiation. It has been reported that this rock was a lump of uranium.

Now I am trying to find out what is happening, Thomas Neff does seem rather hard to find, I have found that a person with this name works at MIT. I have also noticed that another person with this name exists in Germany. It appears that the name Thomas Neff may be a very common name, which can result in confusion.

If any of my readers can put me in touch with the right Thomas Neff, I would be glad to discuss with him the facts of this case.

Now I thought the estimate of 210 mSv per year was rather high, now we should consider how much radium-226 is required to deliver this dose. I have chosen this radionuclide as it is the daughter of uranium which will deliver (with its daughters) the vast majority of the gamma dose from uranium ores.

210 mSv per year is 5.75 microSv per day. Which will work out as 24 microSv per hour.

As one curie of radium-226 and its daughters will deliver 0.79 rads per hour at one meter, this will be 7.9 mGy per hour. Now we can calculate that to get a dose rate of 24 microGy per hour will require 329 times less radioactivity at a distance of 1 meter.

As the half life of uranium-238 is 4.468×109 years, then 3.04 mg of radium will exist in 8830 grams of uranium.

This is because after a long time the rate of decay of the radium (half life of 1620 years) will be equal to the rate of the decay of the uranium. For every Bq (disintegration per second) of uranium-238 there will be 1 Bq of radium-226.

I think that such a lump of uranium ore is rather difficult to obtain. Also the self adsorption of radiation by the ore will greatly reduce the dose per hour near to it. I think that this is a rather unlikely rock.

Now if we consider the idea of a rock which is kept at a distance of 20 cm in a band and that the 210 mSv dose per year is a hand dose then 25 times less uranium ore is needed. This will still be 353.2 grams of uranium. This is a lot of uranium, it is a bit more like a paperweight than a stone which I expect to be displayed in a school.

I am trying to get hold of the people who did the radiometric measurements on the uranium stone, right now it looks like it would be difficult to get this radiation level from natural uranium. If I get more information I will give you an update. Bye for now.


Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: