• Blog Stats

    • 85,300 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 164 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

  • Advertisements

IARC and meat

Dear Reader,

It has come to my attention that the international body which considers the evidence regarding the question of is agent X a carcinogen in humans has decided that red meat is probably carcinogenic to humans while processed meat is carcinogenic to humans. Now I imagine that lots of people have visions of doom in their mind, rather than looking at a nice beef burger or another meat ite m as a nice meal they might feel rather nervous about it. This terror is increased by comments such as those made in the Guardian which seems to equate meat eating with smoking and asbestos. I hold the view that the headline on the Guardian article is the product of either ignorance, laziness or some ideological desire to demonize meat eating.

The problem is that the IARC classes do not represent the level of the threat, they relate to the degree of scientific confidence regarding the question of “is agent X carcinogenic in humans” and not the question of “how carcinogenic is agent X”. This might to some people seem like an attempt to divide hairs but it is an important question.

We should consider some menacing IARC class one carcinogens, I will not go through all of them but here are some.

Estrogen (This is needed by women to maintain healthy bones)

Alcohol in drinks (This is a well known street drug but it is considered safe in small / moderate doses)

Sunlight (Well do not overdo it, while moderate exposure is unlikely to be dangerous it is best to wear sunblock if you will expose large areas of skin to daylight.)

Tamoxifen (this is an anticancer drug)

Now while these four substances I listed which are all class one, I can hardly say that they are all clear menaces to health and society. Maybe as another writer has commented it is time for the IARC to change the way they communicate with the outside world.

The problem is that to get into class one one of the best ways is for an agent to cause a rare form of cancer which can be spotted with ease. This form of cancer might result in very little human suffering is it is a very rare cancer, on the otherhand a more powerful carcinogen which causes a common form of cancer or a large number of common cancers will be much harder to spot. The reason why DES (Diethylstilbestrol) was spotted as a carcinogen was that caused a distinctive and rare form of cancer. It is interesting to note that in Sweden berylium (IARC class 1) is not strongly regulated under the carcinogen law while dimethyl sulfate and diethyl sulfate (IARC class 2a) are very strongly regulated by Swedish law.


Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: