• Blog Stats

    • 82,808 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 158 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

  • Advertisements

Fukushima report by the IAEA

Dear Reader,

Some of my loyal readers will be aware that during the days of the Fukushima accident I was writing a lot explaining the chemistry which was going during the accident. It has come to my attention that the UN (IAEA) has published a report on the accident. I think that this is going to be a very important document both for the pro and antinuclear camps.

Now I need to tell you something, I am well aware of the fact that the IAEA is accused of being a pronuclear lobby group. I hold the view that it is not, while it might have started up as a pronuclear body which had the mission to spread nuclear technology around the world the current IAEA is not the same. I think that the current IAEA exists to promote the safe and responsible use of radiation and nuclear technology, provide advice and to suppress nuclear / radiation activities which are harmful to the global society. For example they would take a dim view if I was to start to mine uranium, enrich it into HEU and then sell it to every Tom, Dick and Harry. They would (and should) do their best to stop someone doing such things.

Regarding the reports I would say that while some of the antinuclear movement might dispute some of what the IAEA write, I would respectfully suggest that any antinuclear person who tells you that the IAEA is wrong, then you should ask the person claiming that the report is wrong to explain why their evidence is able to overrule the IAEA’s report. I would also suggest that anyone from the pro nuclear lobby who tells you that the IAEA are wrong should be greeted with the same polite request.

I will examine the rather large reports from the IAEA, when I have done so I might give you my thoughts on some of the best bits.


Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: