• Blog Stats

    • 71,499 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 146 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

Teaching and tetrafluoroethane

Dear Reader,

I have noticed that a row has erupted regarding the differences between the Swedish and Chinese educational systems, before I get onto the subject of modern freon I would like to give my penny’s worth. The Swedish system as sold to me is largely about people understanding and being able to use skills (sounds very good) while the far eastern system is about students having a good knowledge of things (sounds good also). But there is a problem, students need both.

I have encountered chemical engineering graduates who have never heard of the Seveso accident in Italy, in some ways this is a chem eng accident which is in some ways as bad as Chernobyl, to my mind to be ignorant of an accident which spews toxic muck which kills wildlife and endangers the local people is not a good way for a chem eng student to be. While the student might be able to do a series of calculations of things like heat flows in a set of reactors similar to the one in which the thermal runway occurred in Italy, it is a bad idea for a student to be totally unaware that a major foul up had occurred.

In a similar way I have encountered a PhD student in chemistry who was unaware that chlorine bleach and acid should not be stored in the same wooden cupboard. Now to chemists of my generation it is “schoolboy” level knowledge that chlorine bleach and cyanide are not compatible with acid, contact of potassium cyanide or chlorine bleach with acid forms toxic gas (hydrogen cyanide and chlorine respectively). I had to say that this was not a one off case, I once found a leaking bottle of acid in a crate of chemicals next to a glass bottle of potassium cyanide. The readers will be glad to know that as soon as I found this combination of chemicals, I reached in and pulled the bottle of potassium cyanide out of the crate before putting it in a cupboard which was free of bottles of acids.

To my mind having some knowledge is part of the tool kit of abilities which a chemist needs, a chemist needs to be able to recognise a series of dangerous situations and know instantly how to react. Rather than being required to work out everything from first principles a chemist needs to know things like that “water should not be used on a sodium fire” and “to protect gas cylinders from electric arcs, corrosive substances and mechanical abuse”.

On the other hand I have encountered plenty of chemistry students who fall into a series of traps caused by failure to do anything but recall facts. This takes a range of different forms, one example would be to ignore events in other parts of the world or sectors of society thinking that because an adverse event has not occurred it is impossible while ignoring a related event which occurred either somewhere else or in another sector.

But the one which annoys me most is when people refuse to even try to put two items of information together, for example if I show a chemical reaction such as the aldol reaction and then people want a new mechanism for a closely related reaction such as the Henry reaction, or the final step in the formation of DiNOSar from nitromethane, formaldehyde and cobalt(III) tris ethylene diamine.

To be good at chemistry you need both to be able to remember things and to be able to apply chemical logic and reasoning to new problems.

But back to freon, many years ago it was found that treatment of alkyl chlorides with hydrogen fluoride and a Lewis acid formed alkyl fluorides. In the patent literature it explains how the treatment of trichloroethylene with HF and a Lewis acid forms 1,1,1-trifluoro-2-chloroethane (HCFC-133a) with ease, treatment of the HCFC-133a with more HF under forcing conditions forms the product (HFC-134a).

We should consider the mechanism by which this reaction occurs. The most likely reaction is that the Lewis acid causes the HF to add to the alkene in the trichloroethylene to form 1,1,2-trichloro-1-fluoroethane. The next stage will be that the Lewis acid will pull off a chlorine atom to form a carbocation. If the chlorine at the 2 carbon is removed then the carbocation will be a primary carbocation with no hope of hyperconjugation with a C-H bond.

On the otherhand if one of the chlorines on the 1 carbon is removed then the carbocation will be stabalised by both resonance with the remaining chlorine and hyperconjugation with the C-H bonds on the 2 carbon. This carbocation will then react with a fluoride to form 1,2-dichloro-1,1-difluoroethane.

The removal of the last chlorine on the 1 carbon will form a carbocation which is only stabilised by the hyperconjugation with a C-H bond, this carbocation will form the freon-133a. In the old days freon-133a was used as a feedstock for the production of halothane by means of a free radiacal reaction with bromine. Now days halothane is not used much as it can cause liver damage, it can form trifluoroacetic acid in a human body.

Only under forcing conditions will the last chlorine atom come off to form the carbocation which will then form freon-134a. To do this you need to form a very unstable carbocation, so I imagine that forcing conditions will be needed to do this. While it might seem to some people that I have been working some sort of special mechanistic miracle, I have not I have just applied the ideas of how alkenes react with electrophiles via carbocationic intermediates to our freon problem. Any decent organic chemist could have done the same.

For those of you who do not understand freon codes the work like this,

First number is the number of carbons in the molecule minus one, if this number is zero then you leave it out

Second number is the number of hydrogen atoms in the molecule plus one.

Third number is the number of fluorine atoms in the molecule.


Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: