• Blog Stats

    • 85,382 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 164 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

  • Advertisements

The Mexican Cobalt Source

Dear Reader,

We now have details of the size of the cobalt-60 source stolen and then found in Mexico, it was 3000 Ci according to the IAEA. I was wondering why such a source should be allowed to be driven around without either a police or military escort. I think that if two policemen were to escort the truck with the source then the chances of it being stolen would be greatly reduced, but hindsight is a great thing. With hindsight everything is so clear, with hindsight I am sure that we would allow have more success in life. Just think you would be more able to get your dream job, have success in your love life and avoid doing stupid and embarrassing things. But sadly like the rest of you I can not change the past or rewrite history !

But back to cobalt sources.

I recall in my youth under the supervision of Barry E. Tyler (genius physics teacher) doing the Searle’s bar experiment which is a simple system where heat flows along a thermally isolated bar.

If we have a solid bar with a thermal conductivity of k (W / m K) which has a cross sectional area of A (square meters) and a length of L (meters). Then if a difference of x kelvin (ΔT) exists between the two ends then the thermal power (rate of heat energy transfer through the bar) will be given by

P = k ΔT A / L

The temperature gradient along the bar will be linear.

If on the other hand we were to have a sphere of a solid with a spherical void in the middle containing a heat source then the maths will be a bit more complex.

The surface area of a sphere is given by

A = 4πr2

So it should be clear that the area over which the heat is being transmitted is a function of the distance from the centre of the sphere.

We can say for Searle’s bar that the thermal power is given by

P = A k (dT/dx)

(dT/dx) is the temperature gradient along the bar.

So we can apply our equation to the sphere (x is the distance from the centre of the sphere)

P = 4πx2 k (dT/dx)

Rearrange to get

P / 4πx2 k = (dT/dx)

It is important to note that at the centre of a perfect sphere we could have an infinite thermal gradient, so we should be careful to make sure that the heat source at the centre has a non zero radius.

Things will get more complex in a real shield around a cobalt-60 source as the gamma photons will travel some distance into the lead before their give up their energy to the lead.

If we make a lead shield which is a sphere which has a spherical void which has a radius of 2 cm in the centre and is 12 cm in radius, then we can do some calculations. If we assume that all the radiation is absorbed inside the source at the centre of the sphere and that the thermal output of the source is 250 W then we can make a graph of the temperature of the sphere as a function of the distance from the centre of the sphere.

This was easy but the more complex case of the photons traveling some distance into the lead does seem more fun, now the decay energy of cobalt-60 is 2.824 MeV, of this 96 keV on average is the energy of the beta particles. So we know that 3.4 % of the energy has to be released in the source. If we choose to use the first approximation for gamma rays that they obey the Beer-Lambert rule and that the linear attenuation coefficient in lead is 0.6 cm-1 then we can make a new calculation.

250 W of power from the decay of cobalt-60 in a sphere of lead with a 2 cm radius caviety in the middle

250 W of power from the decay of cobalt-60 in a sphere of lead with a 2 cm radius cavity in the middle


Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: