• Blog Stats

    • 71,499 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 146 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

The greenpace bomb / pod

Dear Reader,

Greenpeace have become upset that the Russians complained that they took an object near a oil / gas site which looked like a bomb. Greenpeace say it is a harmless “pod” which is a cylinder three meters long and two meters in diameter. Greenpeace say it is clearly not a bomb as it is painted in “bright colours”.

The problem is that evil minded bomb makers tend to devise new ways to make their bombs look harmless, for example Ted Kaczynski (Unabomber) made a bomb which looked like a plank of wood.

I am aware of a case in Europe where someone threw a harmless looking object (a snowball) over the fence of a nuclear site. I have visited this nuclear site quite a few times in the course of my professional life, the guards there are a strict but reasonable group of men. The guards impose strict rules but they are a decent bunch of men, I have always found them to be polite and friendly group of men.

However I know that they have an important job to do, they are responsible for preventing unauthorised people entering a site where bomb useable materials are present, they also have the task of preventing the unauthorised movement of nuclear materials in or out of the site.

The problem was that some silly person thought it would be funny to throw a snowball over the fence of the site, at this site all bags and other objects which you take in or out have to be inspected. I am not allowed to carry any cameras, guns, radioactive objects etc etc in or out of the site.

When the snowball went flying over the fence the armed guards quite rightly acted, they went and arrested the snowball thrower. While it might be a harmless object, the problem is that until the snowball is found and examined then it is impossible to know what has come flying over the fence. The problem I see is that the snowball is white and will break up on impact, the ground is covered with white snow. Thus finding the snowball remains will not be easy.

I hold the view that if the person who had thrown the snowball had gone a short distance from the site, or into the woods near the site then they could have had the biggest snow ball fight of history and the guards would not have cared at all, neither would I care about a bunch of youngsters having a snowball fight as long as it occurred at a sensible distance from the site.

In the same way, I am sure that nobody in the oil / gas industry would care less about the “pod” if Greenpeace had taken it somewhere else into the middle of nowhere. The fact that this object was being taken to an illegal protest site makes it an object which the oil / gas platform owners and operators should view as suspect. I also note that Greenpeace are using their pods to try to defeat the security measures being used to prevent unauthorised people boarding ships and oil rigs.

To my mind the pod is being used like an armored lid on a siege engine from ye olde days, while Greenpeace and some others might not like what they think is an overreaction by the Russians (They think their harmless looking pod should be trusted by all people as being eco friendly and harmless) I think that Greenpeace should be ashamed for playing such a stupid card. While after close inspection the pod will be found to be a harmless irritation, quite rightly it should be treated as a suspect object until it is shown to be harmless.

I would also like to ask the reader to consider for a moment what would (and what should) occur if while the Queen is walking around seeing people if you jump over the barrier and run towards her with a bag filled with chocolates and boiled sweets (for her to enjoy later). I suspect that if you are lucky you will just be arrested, while if you are unlucky you will be beaten to the ground or maybe even worse. If any of my readers feel the overwhelming urge to give either Queen Elizabeth the second (of the UK) or the King of Sweden a nice big box of chocolates and other nice things I strongly suggest you contact the office of the head of state some weeks in advance and ask how best the gift should be delivered by some mutually agreeable method.

Even if Greenpeace had been trying to deliver packets of sweets, bottles of gin lemonade, cigarettes heathy snack bars and other gifts to the oil / gas field workers in their pod then they would have had provoked a similar response. I say shame on Greenpeace for playing the “its only a harmless ‘pod’ card”.

Advertisements

2 Responses

  1. What bothers me more is that according to some reports the instillation had divers working in the water at the time. Those nut jobs not only endangered the platform but more importantly those men,in the water, working to feed their families.

    • Very interesting point, I had not heard about divers being in the water at the time.

Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: