• Blog Stats

    • 73,617 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 152 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

Bad journals

Dear Reader,

In the past when a person wanted to publish an article in an academic journal they would send it off, the editor would send it to the referees, the referees wrote reports on this and then if it was OK. The editor would send the article to the printer, the printer then prints it and then sells subscriptions for the journal to the library. A person then goes to the library and reads it.

The new model (gold open access) is that a person writes a paper, they send it off, the editor sends it to the referees, the referees write reports on this and then if it was OK. The editor charges the author a fee and sends the article to the printer, the printer then prints it and sticks copies on the internet. A person then goes to the web or library and reads it.

If you want to know what I think of gold open access then read this, while I do not mind the idea of a journal charging a small fee such as £ 30 for a paper to cover some of the running costs, I think that large fees are unreasonable. I think that green open access is a better idea in many ways.

While some good open access journals exist, there are some very bad ones.

In this new model for journals sadly some bad “shark” journals have appeared, here is a link to a paper about these bad journals. Here is a link to a list of papers which J. Beall considers to be predatory.

Advertisements

Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: