• Blog Stats

    • 75,067 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 156 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

Those in greatest need of moral help

Dear Reader,

I have someone new following, well welcome to Mark Foreman’s chemistry class where he chooses what to teach. The place where we all have an enjoyable time with chemistry. While chemistry should be done while sober it should not be somber.

But we also think about other things, in the same way as chemistry does not exist in a vacuum away from the rest of society we do something think about things that have nothing to do with chemistry.

I am sure that you will be aware that a man attacked a cinema in the US recently. To be frank with you I think that the deeds of James Holmes are disgusting. I saw recently that the Pastor at a church in the USA (where one of the dead worshipped) prayed for the well being of James Holmes. This level of forgiveness and the prayers might be quite a shock to some people.

I heard around about the year 2000 that a catholic priest had prayed for the soul of Adolf Hitler, this caused quite a stir.

Regardless of your religious views the following logic can be applied to these cases (I am paraphrasing the statement of the catholic priest). He said “Those who have done extraordinarily bad things are in special need of moral and spiritual help”.

Another thing (which shocked me at the time) was when one of my sunday school teachers said “God loves Saddam Hussein”, at the time all young people in the UK were viewing Saddam as the ultimate bogey man and as a person to hate. My understanding of what the sunday school teacher was saying was that God loved Saddam and was very unhappy with Saddam’s deeds. But rather than wanting Saddam to be laid low with a thunderbolt God would have been more happy if Saddam had changed his evil ways and become a good man. Sadly in Saddam’s case he did not reform, I guess that you all know what happened regarding Saddam.

Even an atheist would be more happy if Saddam had woken up one morning and suddenly understood that he needed to change his ways and behave better. The danger of striking Saddam dead with a thunderbolt is that someone just as bad would replace him (Saddam 2.0), a new and morally upright Saddam would have been better than either Saddam 2.0 or the old Saddam.

Right now regardless of religious views (or lack of) I think that we can all agree that the gunman responsible for the cinema outrage is in special need of moral guidance. Those of us who take a secular view will be likely to want that he repents sufficiently that he does not add to the distress of those injured and the loved ones of the dead by misbehaving in court.

I am rather displeased that Anders Brevik was allowed to use part of his trial as a soap box for him to spread his poison, I think that TV cameras should be excluded from court but reporters should be allowed to be present for most stages of the trial. I think that the British system is best, the trial should be reported in the media but some restrictions should be imposed to protect the privacy of the victims.

I sincerely hope that both Anders Brevik and James Holmes learn the error of their ways and understand that they have done something deeply wrong. As long as they fail to see the error of their ways both their true punishment and rehabilitation will be delayed.

Advertisements

2 Responses

  1. Hello! Interesting topic, I am mightily and heartily in agree that Yahweh (God) does love these people… but they must change their ways (repent) to have access to that love. There are some interesting teachings about the cinema shoot out, here is my favourite: http://tsiyon.org/ordo-ab-chao-343/ which has a completely different take on it. You can listen for free, see what you think…

    In agreement that chemistry should be done while sober 😀
    Keep up the good work!

  2. well Ginny you have a good point,

    If we take a secular view of the matter than persons like the cinema gunman are in special need of moral guidence which is needed to clean up their lives. As long as they fail to repent (feel true remorse and change their mindset) they are impossible to fix.

    I suspect that if reformed the cinema gunman might devote his time in prison to something more useful than rebelling against the system or sulking in his cell. I have read that a number of people who are in prison (for life) do make some effort to salvage their lives and then do something useful with their time. For example Nathan Leopold did try to do something good with his life after having been sent to prison for a dire murder.

    If we take the religious view, then again they need to want to be helped. From what I know of the three major western religons a person must be willing to accept help from on high.

    I had an interesting discussion with a fellow chemist who is a wahhabist muslim, he said that the most important jihad was the struggle against your own worst character flaws. He said that a person needed the help of God in order to clean up their lives and that “decontaminating” your own life is more important than a struggle against other people. I think that a goal of reducing the number of sins commited by “thought, word and deed” is a very important goal.

    I think that the world would be a better place if people had viewer nasty thoughts in their heads, said fewer horrible things and did fewer nasty actions.

    You could consider God having sent Sadam and the cinema gunman a wounderful present in the post. Both men need to be willing to take the time to extract the present from the packing case and then remove the wrapping paper if they are to find out what is inside and then make use of it.

Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: