• Blog Stats

    • 76,905 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 157 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

Police break into the wrong house

Dear Reader,

This case has made my blood boil, it is one about how the British boys in blue broke into the wrong house causing damage. Then they refuse to pay for the damage that they caused.

I hold the view that if the police break and enter a building then if they either make a mistake or find no sign of criminal activity then they should have to make good any damage which they do. I think that if they force an entry acting in good faith then while it should protect them from criminal law it should not protect them from civil law.

I would like to point out that a typical person drives a car in a manner where they are trying to avoid damaging the property of others (by avoiding crashing the car). Even if you drive in good faith if you crash your car and damage the property of others then you are still required to pay to make good the damage. That is why we have third party liability insurance for our cars.

So if the car driver who attempts to avoid a crash is liable for each crash then surely a person who made a choice to undertake an action which caused damage to the goods/property/person of another should be also liable.

I would like to know why the policeman choose to break down the door. While a sledge hammer can open a door it does make a lot of noise which can alert a nasty occupant in a building, while a lock smith might take a little longer (and cause less damage) it is close to silent. So why then did the police not choose to get a locksmith to open the front door (Zero damage) ?

If any of my readers have an update on this case or opinion then please send me a comment

Advertisements

Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: