• Blog Stats

    • 75,143 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 156 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

Those Who Cry Wolf on matters of the Environment

Dear Reader,

I hope that you are sitting comfortable and then I will begin. I want to remind you about the story of the boy who cried wolf; I suspect that all of you know this story. This wayward lad kept on yelling wolf to see people run around looking for the snap jawed monster, in the end everyone became irked with this juvenile delinquent. They then choose to ignore the lads cries, in the end a real wolf appears. I think the common version of the sorry tale involves serious economic hardship which is visited upon the whole society (the wolf eats all the sheep) but I think a better version would be one where the wolf gets an early dinner in the form of the boy ! In the latter version he has to suffer the consequences of his ill advised words.

Now we are coming up to the first anniversary of the Fukushima event, I hold the view that a lot of both good and bad stuff has been written about the event. Also a lot of good stuff and bad stuff has been said in public and in private by a range of people.

I have noticed something rather interesting and worrying, it does seem that some sections of the media and some members of the environmental lobby have been exaggerating the event and making comments on topics which they know little about, or worse still commenting on matters on which they know a little but not much. I always say a little knowledge is a dangerous thing to have.

Also I have noticed some very poor science in the form of people cherry picking data to create a misleading data set which is then used to support their point of view.

Now before some of you decide that I am some monster who likes forcing mother nature to do degrading horrible stuff or enjoys seeing environmental damage, I want to point out that out of self interest I want to be able to enjoy the benefits of a good and healthy environment. I hold the view that for a good and healthy environment we need not just the pretty animals and cute looking flowers but we also need to look after the ugly and the invisible organisms. Things like ugly toads, vultures and soil bacteria all have their place in nature. One of the ways I try to maintain the environment or even restore it is through the practise of my profession.

Back to what I need to tell you about, the great problem I see is that events like Chernobyl and Fukushima are perfectly ugly and horrible accidents. But the disagreeable nature of these accidents is not a license for dishonesty.

I worry that exaggerations of the health/environmental effects of these events, scare mongering and well intended dishonesty (where a person makes up evidence to support what they think is the right answer) will do a lot of harm in the long run. This is because people will stop paying any attention to the prophets of doom, in the hysterical frenzy nobody will be able to make a sensible/calm/rational choice and society will be distracted from worse matters.

Advertisements

Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: