• Blog Stats

    • 72,568 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 148 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

Depressing film

Dear Reader,

Me and my wife have been watching some disaster films recently, last night we choose to watch “On the Beach” which is a ‘oh so not so joyous film‘ about the end of the human race. The human race is snuffed in the film (and in the novel) out by very intense fallout from a nuclear war.

This made me think about it for a moment, several things were wrong with the physics and the chemistry of the film.

1. The fallout takes many weeks to arrive in Auz, looking at a paper on bomb fallout by some workers from Kyoto, Kanazawa and Hiroshima Universities it is clear that the fallout will be more than 200 times less radioactive gram for gram after ten days than it would have been 2 hours after it was deposited as ‘heavy’ local fallout very close to the bomb detonation.

So by the time that the fallout would have got down under it would have lost much of its strength. In the book on the beach it took much more than ten days for the fallout to arrive in Auz. This means that the reduction in the radioactivity due to simple decay would be even larger.

I had taken a very simple view that no chemical separation would have occurred during the transport of the radioactivity from the bomb detonation to Auz.

2. Around about 10 to 100 days after detonation the majority of the gamma dose will be due to Te-132/I-132, Ba-140 / La-140, Zr-95 / Nb-95, Ru-103 and I-131. While the iodine (I) and tellurium (Te) are very mobile the barium (Ba) and zirconium are less mobile. A good rule of thumb is that the chemical form of an isotope twenty seconds after the detonation will determine how the isotope behaves.

100 % of the zirconium-95 will be in the form of yttrium-95 (half life ten minutes) at twenty seconds after detonation. The yttrium is very non volatile and is likely to be in the form of an solid oxide at that point. I suspect that it will be very likely to become part of the larger particles from things like soil which will fall to earth more quickly. As a result the local fallout close to the bomb will be enriched in zirconium-95 while the distant fallout will have less of this isotope.

The barium-140 will be formed from cesium-140 (half life one minute) which will be the form of this isobar twenty seconds after the detonation. The cesium is only a semi volatile so about 30 % will be in a solid form.

The ruthenium-103 (Ru) is formed by the decay of molybedum-103 (Mo), as the Mo-103 has a half life of seventy seconds it will dictate much of the behaviour of the Ru-103.  The boiling point of MoO3 is about 1160 oC which is lower than that of ZrO2 and Y2O3 (both about 4300 oC) and higher than what I would expect for of Cs2O. So as a result I much of the ruthenium-103 to be lost into solid particles. So the enrichment process may tend to deposit it in the local fallout.

Now according to the graphs published by Japanese workers if all the involatile forms of the radioisotopes are lost from the fallout then the dose absorbed over the ten to one hundred days the will be only three quarters of the dose which would have been suffered if no chemical fractionation had occurred.

Both of these effects would tend to protect the population down under by lowering their dose, I hold the view that a nuclear war would be a horrible event. But I do not think that a total extermination of mankind by fallout would be a certainty.

Advertisements

One Response

  1. The great DX8 2XL has liked this post. By the way the Japanese paper I was reading was in Journal of Radiation Research, 2006, volume 47, A121-A127

Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: