• Blog Stats

    • 75,866 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 156 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

The legal response to the riots part II

Dear Reader,

In the UK one of the responses to the riots is for the local authority to take legal action to evict persons accused of taking part in the riots. I see a series of problems here. Also calls have been made to stop the benifits of those involved in the riots.

1. Accused does not equal guilty, a person can be found not guilty at a trial. Also a person is presumed to be innocent until proven otherwise.

2. How do we know that the evictions will not promote crime, we need to think “what is the purpose of the criminal legal system”. I think that one of the purposes of the system is to protect society from crime. If an action of the legal system is likely to promote crime by creating an environment in which crime will flourish then the action should not be done.

It has been argued that poveity does promote some forms of crime, I think it is immoral for society to force a person to choose between staving to death and stealing.

3. I reason also that if we throw the people accused of taking part in the riots out of social housing onto the streets then this punishment will only apply to the poor, what about those rioters from rich familes who coordinated their neferious deeds using blackburies and other expensive electronic gadgets. No body is proposing throwing people out of privately rented hosuing or throwing criminals who own houses out of their homes as a punishment.

Advertisements

Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: