• Blog Stats

    • 75,866 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 156 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

Reactor grade plutonium and its poor quaility for bomb making

It has been said that reprocessing is bad for world peace, and that it will make it easier for a bomb maker to obtain the plutonium needed for a bomb. I hold the view that a PWR or BWR is strongly optimised for making electricity rather than bomb useable plutonium.

In a CANDU, RBMK, MAGNOX or AGR reactor it is possible to refuel the reactor while it is running, this allows short irradiation times which favour plutonium production for bombs. But in a BWR and PWR it is not possible to refuel it while it is running; this feature of the design makes it harder to make bomb grade plutonium using one of these reactors.

This is because the isotope signature of plutonium for a bomb making becomes worse with an increased irradiation time and burn up in the reactor. On the other hand an electric power company wants to get the most energy out of each fuel element, so they will want to get the highest burn up possible out of the fuel during a long irradiation time. These two considerations oppose each other.

In a recent paper the isotope signature of a used PWR fuel was given in a paper, this was fuel which had a burn up of 27.3 megawatt days per ton of uranium.

238Pu              0.27 g per Kg

239Pu              5.40 g per Kg

240Pu              2.06 g per Kg

241Pu              0.55 g per Kg

242Pu              0.39 g per Kg 

This works out as plutonium which by weight is

238Pu 3.1%

239Pu 62.3 %

240Pu 23.8 %

241Pu 6.3 %

242Pu 4.5 %

You might ask why this is important, it is important in the design of an atomic bomb to make sure that the implosion occurs faster than the generation of neutrons by spontaneous fission in the nuclear fuel used to make the bomb. If we assume that we need 10 kilos of plutonium to build a bomb then we can calculate based on the isotope signature how quickly neutrons will be generated by spontaneous fission in the fuel.

If we have ten kilos of the plutonium then we will have 310 grams of 238Pu. This isotope of Pu has a half life of 88 years and 1.9 x 10-7 of decays are spontaneous fissions.

The half life is 2777068800 seconds

So as the decay constant is ln 2 / half life = 2.49597 x 10-10 s-1.

As we have 1.3 moles of this plutonium isotope we have 7.84378 x 1023 atoms of the plutonium, which means that we have 1,95778 x 1014 Bq (196 TBq) of activity. As the branch ratio for spontaneous fission is 1.9 x 10-7 then we will have 3.72 x107 fissions per second.

We can repeat the maths for the other plutonium isotopes present.

Overall for this plutonium we can calculate that 1.87 x 108 spontaneous fission events will occur per second. So a bomb based on this plutonium would have to be imploded in less than 5.34 nanoseconds. Which is a very short length of time.

If we repeat the calculation using the isotope signature for the plutonium (99% Pu-239 and 1% Pu-240) used for the first ever atom bomb test (trinity), then we get a time of 209 nanoseconds. This is a much longer time which will make the task of the bomb maker much easier.

If the bomb design fails to implode in the time between the spontaneous fissions then it will give either a zero explosive yield or a very small yield.


Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: