• Blog Stats

    • 74,442 hits
  • Archives

  • Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email.

    Join 156 other followers

  • Copyright notice

    This blog entry and all other text on this blog is copyrighted, you are free to read it, discuss it with friends, co-workers and anyone else who will pay attention.

    If you want to cite this blog article or quote from it in a not for profit website or blog then please feel free to do so as long as you provide a link back to this blog article.

    If as a school teacher or university teacher you wish to use content from my blog for the education of students then you may do so as long as the teaching materials produced from my blogged writings are not distributed for profit to others. Also at University level I ask that you provide a link to my blog to the students.

    If you want to quote from this blog in an academic paper published in an academic journal then please contact me before you submit your paper to enable us to discuss the matter.

    If you wish to reuse my text in a way where you will be making a profit (however small) please contact me before you do so, and we can discuss the licensing of the content.

    If you want to contact me then please do so by e-mailing me at Chalmers University of Technology, I am quite easy to find there as I am the only person with the surname “foreman” working at Chalmers. An alternative method of contacting me is to leave a comment on a blog article. If you do not know which one to comment on then just pick one at random, please include your email in the comment so I can contact you.

Actinides (plutonium) in soil near the Japanese nulcear reactors

Dear Readers,

I have recently been supplied with some information about the soil near to the Fukuashima plant, these soil samples were taken about 500 meters away from the stricken plant. The results are mixed.

Some observers have been expressing a view that a horrible large scale release of nuclear fuel and plutonium has occurred from the spent fuel pond and the reactors. I know that at Chernobyl that a steam explosion occurred which scattered fuel over the accident site and high into the air. In Japan no similar large explosion has occurred, the hydrogen explosions were not good. These may have damaged the plant but the hydrogen air explosions occurred outside the containment. So I do not think as large release of plutonium has occurred in Japan as occurred at Chernobyl, it is also important to bear in mind that only a small minority of the plutonium in the Chernobyl reactor escaped into the environment. Any plutonium release is bad but not all plutonium releases are equal.

Also bear in mind that the isotopes of plutonium are different. (All plutonium is equal but some plutonium is more equal than others). The release of a gram of Pu-238 is much more important than a release of a gram of Pu-239 as the Pu-238 has a higher radioactivity for a given mass.

So these explosions have damaged the less important parts of the building, but it is important to bear in mind that the spent fuel ponds are outside the containment. Right now in general I do not want to start to consider who is to blame for what, but for the ponds I will make an exception. I think that placing the spent fuel ponds outside the containment, and not in its own containment was an unwise design choice.

Back to the results, the good news is that the alpha activity in the soil appears to be very low, it is mostly due to uranium. The uranium isotope signature matches one which I have calculated for natural uranium and the activity level is in the normal range for an unpolluted soil. Almost all soil contains some uranium, so it is impossible to find a soil which is totally free of radioactivity.

Here is a graph of the different levels of the radioisotopes in the soil at two points 500 meters from the reactor accident.

The levels of different isotopes in the soil near the Japanese reactor accident. I suspect that these levels were measured by an alpha spectrometer.

The bad news is that some of the actinides (elements such as plutonium, americium and curium) have escaped from the damaged reactors. I have included data for the two different sampling sites on the bar chart. I have also included the estimated isotope signature which has been predicted using the ORIGEN code for reactors 1,2 and 3. The Pu-238, Am-241, Cm-242 and Cm-243/Cm-244 ratio between the real samples and the ORIGEN prediction are very close.

The half life of Cm-242 only 163 days so the curium-242 release is likely to be due to a recent release of radioactivity rather than something which has built up slowly over many years. The Curium-242 is likely to have formed from Americium-241 by neutron activation followed by beta decay. But it is important to bear in mind that the release of the plutonium and minor actinides has been small when compared with the release of the iodine and cesium isotopes. My own view is that right now the beta / gamma emitters which are fission products are likely to pose the greatest threat to the general public.

Advertisements

One Response

  1. I think this is one of the such a lot significant information for me.
    And i’m satisfied reading your article. But should observation on few common issues, The website style
    is perfect, the articles is truly nice : D.
    Good job, cheers

Go on, Have your say !

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: